<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>R. Dean Anderson Jr. on Readings in the Reformed Diaconate</title>
    <link>http://reformeddeacon.com/authors/r.-dean-anderson-jr./</link>
    <description>Recent content in R. Dean Anderson Jr. on Readings in the Reformed Diaconate</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    
	<atom:link href="http://reformeddeacon.com/authors/r.-dean-anderson-jr./index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Are Deacons Members of the Session?</title>
      <link>http://reformeddeacon.com/are-deacons-members-of-the-session/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>http://reformeddeacon.com/are-deacons-members-of-the-session/</guid>
      <description>Excerpt  Here we see that the French inclusion of the deacons with the consistory was NOT because they viewed the office of deacon as a ruling office, but because they viewed their deacons as called at the same time to be assistant elders. Here they were evidently able to give some &amp;ldquo;after the fact&amp;rdquo; justification of their actual practice, while at the same time being careful not to blur (theologically) the Scriptural distinction between the office of elder and that of deacon.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>